Monthly Archives: May 2010

Get Lost (or not)

DON’T watch this video if:

  • You haven’t seen the Lost finale but plan to.
  • You’re sick of talking about the show and have moved on with your life.

DO watch this video if:

  • You disagree with my earlier post saying that the Lost storytelling was, in the end, rubbish.
  • You agree with my earlier post, but your friends say your nitpicking for not being satisfied with the final season of the show
  • You’re a fan fiction writer and need a quick refresher on all the plot holes you’ll be expected to fill
  • You’ve been writing a hit TV series for six years, but still haven’t learned the lesson that you can plot out your story in advance (and you have known for years exactly how many episodes you would have to write).

[having some embedding issues and it's 2 AM so I don't feel like troubleshooting; but here's the link to the video]

Hat tip to Jeff

Meet the new band! On Thursday night!

Very excited to “announce” my new band, Shakedown at the Majestic. Those who knew me in college might remember the band as Fat Elvis…same guitar player/singer (Chris Vermillion), same bassist (me), but we swapped out my brother on drums for a crazed percussive animal named Taylor.

Chris called me about a month ago asking if I’d replace their outgoing bassist, and how could I say no? He’s a fantastic songwriter–fun tunes that are a little pop, a little surf rock, a little doo-wop, a little ska, a little british invasion, and just a hint of late-70s punk. And the best thing about his songs is they make that blend of genres feel entirely natural (if hard to describe). Get a taste at our MySpace page…I recommend starting with “Run for Your Life.” If you don’t like that tune, you probably don’t like music, or maybe your heart is dead or something. You should get it checked out.

And BTW, it’s totally inconceivable that MySpace STILL doesn’t let you embed tracks from its player. Ridiculous.

Anyway, my first show with Shakedown at the Majestic was at a street fair on Saturday (photo above), and we’ve got another show Thursday night on the Lower East Side. R Bar, 9PM. Come on out, it’ll be fun!

P.S. — I’ll be editing some video from Saturday’s show, and I’ll post it here and on YouTube when it’s ready. Unless it sucks.

P.P.S. — If you’re wondering about Mere, our showcase at CMJ in October will almost certainly turn out to have been our last show. The guitarist and songwriter just moved to Georgia, the singer’s got his big TV moment (he’s in The Pacific), and our wives all had babies at the same time. So the story of Mere ends happily, I think. And our commercial is still airing during NBA games (which never seem to end).

P.P.P.S. — If you’re wondering about The Sabre Rattlers, we’re on summer hiatus while our fiddle player is out of town. But I got to join Mark for a quick set at the street fair on Saturday. It was good times…we played several songs for the first time up on stage. That’s how real folk music is made–if you know all the lyrics, it ain’t real folk music!

Lessons from Lost

Before we start, I’ll just let you know that there are NO spoilers in this post (and please don’t post any in the comments). So you laggards who are waiting for the DVD, read on with impunity.

I won’t comment on the finale from last night, except to say that it sealed in my brain the impression that the show was a shoddy piece of storytelling. There–that’s out of the way.

The REAL issue that I want to think about a bit in this post is fandom. In my still-kind-of-newish advertising job, one of my focuses is on getting PEOPLE to become AUDIENCE MEMBERS, and to transition them from AUDIENCE to ADVOCATES. How do you get non-users of a product to consider the product? And then to purchase the product? And then to tell others about the product? That’s the bazillion-dollar question in this era of social media and in our increasingly recommendation-based economy: how do you mint FANS?

Lost was brilliant at it. Remember those first two seasons? Lost won fans by consistently, methodically revealing new puzzles for viewers to work on (but not solve). The show used the web to spread transmedia games and video clips with clues. Guys like EW’s Doc Jensen went WAY in-depth with episode-by-episode anlysis, and he was provided with tantalizing nuggets of info by the show’s writers themselves. And remember the Sprite commercial with the secrets about the Hanso corporation?

Continue reading

The Great Mormon Novel

Interesting article in Slate today about The Great Mormon Novel…namely, why hasn’t it been written yet? The author is the poetry editor at Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought, so he has probably spent a bit more time hunting for the Great Mormon Novelist than you or I have, and he writes about Mormons with quite a bit of insight.

Why aren’t mormons better at creating compelling art? It’s a question I think about a lot. I devote quite a bit of time to either consuming or playing music, and would probably participate in a mormon music scene if there ever could be such a thing. But it’s denied existence by two factors:

1) The lack of alcohol has a very real effect on mormons’ ability to enjoy live music. This is not meant as a ding–mormons like to have fun as much as anyone–but listening to a live rock band play in a loud, small club is torture for 90% of the population; doing it sober is torture for 99% of the population. Plus, sober fans throw a wrench in the live music machine because there are no alcohol sales to subsidize the venue (that’s why you have 60K college kids in Provo, but almost no live music clubs).

2) Mormons tend not to be very good lyricists. Or writers of any kind. Or artists. There, I said it.

Continue reading

Tech Support Secrets

So true. Thanks, xkcd!

Moms and Dads

Moms definitely get the short shrift when if comes to credit and praise.

Case in point: We’re at a BBQ last week, hanging out with some old friends, and I’m holding Ada and playing around with her, and one of my friends said to me “I always knew you’d be a good father!”

My first thought was “Hey, thanks!” My second thought was of a story from Michael Chabon’s excellent book, Manhood for Amateurs. I hope he’ll forgive me if I quote a bit too extensively from it (go buy the book so he lets it slide–$10 in paperback!).

The handy thing about being a father is that the historic standard is so pitifully low. One day a few years back I took my youngest son to the market around the corner … I wasn’t quite sure why the woman in line behind us kept beaming so fondly in our direction.

“You’re such a good dad,” she said finally. “I can tell.”

I looked at my son. He was chewing on the paper coating of a wire twist tie … I thanked her … went off with my boy in one arm and a bag of groceries in the other, and when we got home I put a plastic bowl filled with Honey Nut Cheerios in front of him and checked my email. I was a really good dad.

I don’t know what a woman needs to to do to impel a perfect stranger to inform her in the grocery story that she is a really good mom. Perhaps perform an emergency tracheotomy with a Bic pen on her eldest child while simultaneously nursing her infant and buying two weeks’ worth of healthy but appealing breaktime snacks for the entire cast of Lion King, Jr. In a grocery store, no mother is good or bad; she is just a mother, shopping for her family.

It’s so true. I get the same beaming look that Chabon got in the grocery store, just for pushing a stroller down the street or carrying Bumblebee in her Baby Bjorn. I guess I’m a great dad because I take my baby someplace without her mom. That’s not a very high bar to try and clear. During the week, I see my kid maybe 2 or 3 hours a day if I’m lucky, and when I’m not with her, I’m doing the same thing I was doing before I became a parent: I go to work. Meanwhile, Corinne’s life has changed completely, and she’s with Bumblebee pretty much every second the baby’s awake.

To paraphrase Chabon’s point, we tend to measure fathers in instants. For example, dad flying a kite in the park with his kid = great dad. Dad goes to kid’s soccer game = great dad. Dad playing with kid at BBQ = great dad.

Moms, on the other hand, are evaluated over the course of years, decades, and lifetimes. Chabon says “Good mothering is a long-term pattern, a lifelong trend of behaviors most of which go unobserved at the time by anyone, least of all the mother herself.” And sometimes the final judgment on a mom isn’t  pronounced at all until her funeral. “She was a great mom. She was always there for me.”

Well, it’s almost insulting to say this on Mother’s Day (it shouldn’t need to be elicited by such an occasion), but both the moms in my life are incredible. In fact, so is Corinne’s mom. They deserve to be told that more often, so I’m going to work on that, starting with a lame blog post. And I’m going to make sure Bumblebee grows up knowing what a great mom she has, and what a great mom I had.

Now go call your mother.

Newsweakness

Did anyone NOT see the Newsweek sell-off coming? I mean yikes. I’ll always have a special place in my heart for Newsweek, as it was the first magazine I really got addicted to reading when I was in high school, and because landing an internship there was a dream come true (and a lot of fun). But they epitomize old-magazine thinking to me. And not in a good, Economist sort of way.

There’s a certain trend right now, pervasive in advertising and the media, of old people making strange decisions in order to impress or please young people. I went to a publishing/ad industry lunch the other week at which a bunch of suits were talking about the importance of Foursquare and Twitter–but nobody had their phone out to check in or tweet (nor could I picture any of them doing so). I’m not an ageist–I know plenty of 40- and 50-year-olds who are avid Twitter users, and are as “digitally native” as any 18-year-old–it’s just funny to watch a media pro target demographics that he or she doesn’t understand, and it happens all the time. The real irony of that lunch was all the discussion and even laughter about the “25-year-old planners” who “do all the *real* work at an ad agency.”

Continue reading

All the news that’s fit to…what?

Funny story: Apparently Steve Jobs hates the NY Times iPad app.

Been thinking a lot about my own news consumption habits lately (as in…oh…the last 8 years). But especially today, because I totally missed the Nashville flood until my friend Whitney tweeted about it this afternoon. Honestly, hadn’t heard anything about it.

I spend pretty much all day every day immersed in tech news sites.When it comes to non-tech news, I get almost all of it from The Daily Show and from links I see posted on Twitter (I follow mostly journalists and news organizations on Twitter).I also read The New Yorker, Wired, and New York magazines, but those aren’t really sources of “hard news.” On a day-by-day level, my news consumption is admittedly a bit scattershot.

Continue reading

Hit to Right Field (it’s not that hard)

It’s strange, but my blog post from last year on coed softball positioning is the most popular post on my blog, even a year later. I guess the web is devoid of bloggers opining on whether you should hide your worst player at 2B, RF, or catcher. So I’ll do one more post.

Teams hide their bad fielders in Right and on 2B for a reason: Right-handed batters don’t naturally hit to right field, or to the soft gap between 1B and 2B. Which means if there’s a good shot to RF, forget about it. Runner’s going to get at least a double, and might make it all the way around. In that infield gap, there’s a danger in hitting it straight to the first baseman (first baseperson?), but even then,  he/she’s got to beat you to the bag or the pitcher has to have the presence of mind to get there before you do.

A right-handed batter that can hit to right field is going to produce runs. I think the typical way of doing it is to swing a millisecond later, but I’ve never had much luck with that–just results in foul balls. There’s an easier way to do it. In slow pitch, while the ball is in the air, just pivot your body by moving your right foot back a bit (you’re basically stepping in the bucket before you swing). Tada! Your body is angled to hit to right field. Two things to note:

  • You’re going to lose some power by stepping away from the ball like that
  • It’s a little awkward to hit a ball that’s kind of coming in from behind you (but not much more difficult)

After a couple seasons of doing this, I can hit to RF with  50% or 60% regularity, and I’ve never been thrown out or caught out by a savvy right-fielder (they don’t exist). And once your opponent knows you can do it, they compensate by shifting the CF or the Rover over to cover for RF, which gives you some nice gaps in your more natural hitting zone. With luck, you can get two RF shots in before they recognize what you’re doing. If you ever have a twinge of guilt for picking on the poor right-fielder, just remind yourself that you’re giving him/her valuable fielding experience.

I’ve never played fast-pitch, but I imagine the process would be similar (but more difficult). Two issues though:

  • You probably don’t have time to pivot your feet during the pitch, and setting up your stance before the pitch is going to telegraph where you’re hitting to.
  • Fast-pitch players might be more skilled on average than slow-pitch players, so you get diminishing returns from contorting your batting stance to target RF.

Try it out and let me know how it goes. Or share tricks of your own.