The issue is this: I absolutely give Michael Jackson a pass on his personal morality and character (I just wrote him a eulogy!), while I think Mark Sanford should step down from office and never be heard from again.
Why do I turn a blind eye to MJ’s alleged messing around with kids and whatever else he did, while condemning the politician whose misconduct is arguable less hurtful?
It’s not because Sanford is a politician. There’s a debate raging on a friend’s Facebook wall (and on Twitter, and everywhere else) about whether personal infidelity disqualifies a man for office. I don’t think it does, nor do I think it’s particularly relevant during a campaign.
But there are justifiable exceptions. The first is, unfortunately, Republicans. Sorry guys, Democrats can cheat on their wives. You can’t. You’ve spent too much time talking up family values in order to justify anti-gay rhetoric (let’s call a spade a spade here). If you’re going to base your argument against gays getting married on the idea that marriage is holy, or moral, or good for society, you better WALK THE EFFING WALK, my friend. You do much more to devalue marriage in our society than a two-groom wedding ceremony ever could.
To talk up the sanctity of marriage and then run off to see your Argentinian girlfriend or schtupp some other dude in an airport bathroom should be grounds for resignation, yeah. Because you’re voting according to your phony rhetoric, and your vote is actually affecting other peoples’ lives. And because the people who voted for you might actually believe in those values you ran on, they probably don’t want you to represent them anymore anyway.
Sorry Republican philanderers, but at least it’s fair. Also, John Edwards, you’re in this group too. People were only voting for you because of your wife anyway.
The second exception is when the affair results in abuse of power. New Jersey Governor McGreevey can have all the homosexual affairs he wants, but when he tries to put his boyfriend on the state payroll as New Jersey Homeland Security Chief, it’s time to go. And don’t blame the gay sex, because that had nothing to do with it. You should be in jail.
Anyway, here’s some good analysis by The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post on the subject, and some ridiculously shallow analysis by The Associated Press.