Monthly Archives: October 2008

Some Music to Dig On

Corinne and I went on a music-buying spree the other day, and we finally picked up the Mates of State and MGMT albums we’ve wanted to get for so long. Highly recommended. Here’s a taste of each:

@import url(http://skreemr.com/styles/embed.css);

Mates of State – My Only Offer
Found at skreemr.com
@import url(http://skreemr.com/styles/embed.css);

MGMT – Kids
Found at skreemr.com

While I’m on the subject, we also got Jenny Lewis’ second solo album. Yeah, not so good…certainly not as good as “Rabbit Fur Coat.” That makes two strikes against her (I didn’t like Rilo Kiley’s most recent one either). Save your $9.99.

One Meeeellion Dollars

That’s how much the Team USA Olympic Soundtrack, of which Mere was a part, raised for the Team USA athletes. To put that in perspective, that’s a million double cheeseburgers from McDonalds, or TWO million hot apple pies. Multiple it by 700,000 and you have the size of the US bailout.

Hooray! My Site is Back!


My blog decided to take a week-long hiatus. Apparently the Google Blogger platform changed some of its server policies for custom domains, so I had to…

…oh, I’m boring you? Ok. Anyway, the blog is back. Hooray blog!

Is BYU Really a Top 10 Team Right Now?


This might be heresy, but BYU is going to be ranked too high after today’s games. Were you watching as the No. 1, No. 2, and No. 3 ranked teams in the country were upset by the No. 5, No. 17, and No. 12 teams, respectively? All six teams in those three games played great football today, and deep down, I’m not sure how BYU would/will stack up against one of them in a BCS bowl.

Their running backs are slippery. Their quarterbacks are sharp. Their WRs are fast. Those are my three worries.

BYU’s offense will put points on the board against any team. We’ve got a lethal combination of QB, RB, FB, TE, and more than one good WR, and our O-line might just be the best in the country.

Our defense, though, has yet to be tested. We’ve had an impressive run of shutouts or near shutouts this year, but that stat lies a bit, because we have yet to play a real QB who’s on his game. UCLA’s QB was a third-stringer, and New Mexico’s was also a backup. Wash. QB Jake Locker had good foot speed, but his arm was awful that day. And those are our three big wins so far this year.

Assuming we win out the season, we’ll almost certainly go to a BCS bowl game, and some are speculating that if the stars align just right, we could play for the national championship.

Should that happen, I’ll be scared to death, especially after watching Florida today, (who is ranked four spots behind us). How will our safeties and corners fare against Tim Tebow’s arm and his wide-receivers’ speed? And forget the throwing game—we struggled to contain the New Mexico running game and Jake Locker’s QB sneaks. How in the world would we be able to contain FLORIDA’s running game, which consists of super-human backs and a fearless running QB?

Our star players are juniors this year–we lose our all-star O-line and a couple other standouts, but that’s about it. Which means next year’s team has every chance of being even bigger and more explosive than this year’s. Which means the WORST thing that can happen is what happened to Hawaii last year: we have an undefeated season full of blowouts, and then go to a huge bowl game and get destroyed. That could wreck the credibility of every non-BCS team for years to come. We could go undefeated next year and end up in the Las Vegas Bowl.

Anyway, all I’m saying is we’re ranked too high right now. So far this season we’ve been ranked higher than USC and Florida…and honestly, would the Las Vegas odds favor us in matchups against those teams? Nuh-uh.

Tech Crash on the Horizon?

This may not be the place to post this, but it wouldn’t be appropriate on any of my other blogs either, so I’ll toss it up here. New York venture capitalist Nate Westheimer did a good post on his blog yesterday about how the economic downturn will affect tech investing over the next few months/years. To oversimplify his point, he’s saying it hasn’t been and won’t be affected as much as we’d think:

…in the early stage investing world, relative to the rest of the financial markets, times aren’t changing very much at all.

Even if you’re not super into tech, this is an important question. We’re coming off a heady few years of tech boom, in which there’s been easy investment money available for every crazy Web startup that cares to take it. I asked Michael Arrington last year which startup sectors were having the easiest time raising capital, and he snorted and said “Everybody’s getting funded.” As such, there’s been an explosion in Web startups—I spend all day looking at new Web sites and meeting with companies and I can’t even scratch the surface of all the great stuff out there.

Think of the cool stuff that’s come out in, oh, the past three years. Tons of social networks. Tons of free music services, video-sharing sites, and photo sites. Tons of blogging and micro-blogging platforms. Free web-based apps that do everything.

Here’s where I have the problem: Nate argues in his post that early-stage investing hasn’t gotten much riskier in the last couple weeks. In fact, since it hasn’t gotten much riskier and traditional Wall Street investing is much more risky right now, the relative risk of early-stage investing has gone way down.

I have to disagree with him, though; I think techstartupland is a much more treacherous place than it was two weeks ago. Consider all those new social networks, music services, blogging/microblogging platforms, and Web-based apps. The vast majority of them make their money by selling ads. Well, one of the first markets to soften in an economic downturn is the ad market—companies slash their ad/marketing budgets first thing.

Now, obviously there are lots of B2B and non-consumer-facing startups that make their money the old-fashioned way: by selling a product, whether it’s infrastructure or development or enterprise apps or what have you. But on the consumer side, it’s next to impossible to sell a web-based product or service nowadays—we just expect everything to be free—which is why advertising has gradually become the crutch that supports the entire web startup industry.

I give it two or three months until that crutch is removed, and that’s assuming the existing 2008 budgets aren’t cut into. When the ad money dries up, it’s going to affect bottom lines and valuations in a big way.